Table of contents
- Quick side-by-side comparison of Notion and Coda
- Difference between Notion and Coda in how they work
- Workspace philosophy: wiki first vs app builder first
- How they organize information
- Learning curve and first time setup
- Notion vs Coda for writing, notes, and knowledge bases
- Editor experience and note taking
- Building a team wiki or knowledge hub
- Collaboration, comments, and search
- Coda vs Notion for databases, projects, and automation
- Databases vs tables: relations, lookups, and rollups
- Project and task management setups
- Automation, buttons, and workflows
- Showdown of Notion AI and Coda AI
- Writing, summarizing, and knowledge Q&A
- AI for data, formulas, and workflow building
- AI pricing, limits, and value for teams
- Integrations, ecosystem, and extensibility
- Native integrations and APIs
- Templates, add ons, and community tools
- Publishing, sharing, and turning workspaces into websites
- Pricing and value of Notion and Coda
- Pricing models at a glance
- Notion vs Coda for individuals and small teams
- Coda or Notion for growing and enterprise teams
- Performance, reliability, and security basics
- Speed, stability, and offline behavior
- Desktop, mobile, and cross device experience
- Permissions, roles, and security overview
- Real world workflows: Notion vs Coda for different teams
- Solo creators and personal productivity
- Content, marketing, and documentation teams
- Product, engineering, and operations teams
- Which is the right workspace for your team?
- Why Notion with Super is a powerful long term setup
- Frequently asked questions
- What is the main difference between Notion and Coda?
- Is Notion or Coda easier to learn?
- Which tool is more flexible for personal use?
- Does either app work well offline?
- How does Super work with Notion compared to using Coda alone?
- Which tool is better for non technical teammates?
Notion and Coda both promise the same thing: one flexible workspace where your docs, tasks, and data finally live in one place instead of being scattered across five different tools. Each lets you mix pages, databases, and embeds into a system that can replace a surprising amount of your current stack. At a glance they look similar enough that many teams end up doing a Notion vs Coda comparison before they commit.
Under the surface, though, these apps have different personalities. Notion leans into being a clean, wiki first hub for notes, documentation, and structured pages, while Coda behaves more like an app builder hiding inside a document. As more teams try to replace spreadsheets, slide decks, and docs with a single source of truth, the question is shifting from "which tool is more powerful" to "which one fits how we actually work". This guide puts Notion vs Coda side by side, then focuses on how they feel in daily use rather than just listing features.
If you are choosing Notion or Coda for a team, you care about more than just a feature checklist. You want to know how quickly people can learn it, how it scales as you add more projects and content, and whether it will still work for you a year from now. The rest of this article walks through all of that so you can make a confident decision without spending weeks testing both tools yourself.
Curious what your Notion workspace would look like as a real website? Try Super and turn your pages into a fast, branded site without touching code. Start with your existing docs, connect Super, and see it live in minutes.
Try Super for FREE today
Quick side-by-side comparison of Notion and Coda
Area | Notion | Coda |
Overall fit | Wiki first workspace for docs, notes, and structured databases | Doc and table centric workspace that behaves like a no code app builder |
Best suited for | Knowledge bases, docs, content workflows, team hubs | Data heavy workflows, internal tools, operations dashboards |
Ease of use | Very approachable for new users; simple mental model of pages and blocks | Steeper learning curve; you need to understand tables, formulas, and Packs |
Writing and notes | Excellent distraction free editor with flexible blocks and backlinks | Good editor but feels more table centric and structured by default |
Databases and tables | Strong databases with multiple views, relations, and rollups | Extremely powerful tables with lookup columns, rich formulas, and cross document sync |
Automation | Growing set of native automations plus strong support through tools like Zapier and Make | Deep automations through rules, buttons, and Packs that can update other tools directly |
AI features | Notion AI is great for writing, summarizing, and editing text across your workspace | Coda AI shines when working with tables, formulas, and structured data while still handling writing |
Templates and community | Huge template ecosystem, active community, and many third party creators | Smaller but passionate community with good examples for operations and data workflows |
Integrations | Solid native integrations plus a public API that works well with automation platforms | Packs provide deep connections to tools like Slack, Google Calendar, and more, plus an API |
Mobile and offline | Mature mobile apps and decent offline access through the desktop and mobile apps | Mobile is improving but can feel slower; offline support is more limited |
Pricing for individuals | Strong free plan and affordable per user paid plans | Free plan is generous for basic docs but table limits appear faster |
Pricing for teams | Simple per user pricing; easiest for small to mid sized teams | Per doc maker pricing can be cheaper for large teams with many viewers |
Public sharing and publishing | Easy to publish pages or entire workspaces; works very well with tools like Super for full websites | Can publish docs publicly but feels more like sharing apps than building sites |
Best if you | Want one place for notes, docs, and light project tracking, plus a strong community and publishing options | Want to build custom internal tools and dashboards without writing code |
Difference between Notion and Coda in how they work

At a high level, Coda vs Notion feels like two answers to the same question: what if documents were powerful enough to run your team? The way each tool structures information explains why they attract different kinds of teams.
Workspace philosophy: wiki first vs app builder first
Notion starts from the idea of a page. Everything is a page, and every page is made from blocks like text, headings, images, databases, callouts, or embeds. That wiki first approach makes it natural to turn Notion into a knowledge base or central hub where everything links together.
Coda thinks of the workspace more as a place to build mini apps. You still get pages, but the real focus is on tables, buttons, and Packs that connect to other tools. Each document can feel like a custom app for your team, with actions that change data, trigger automations, or update other services.
If you mostly need a shared brain full of pages, docs, and simple databases, Notion compared to Coda will usually feel lighter and more aligned with that goal. If you need something closer to a no code toolkit for internal tools, Coda compared to Notion may feel more exciting.
How they organize information
In Notion, your workspace is a tree of pages and sub pages in the sidebar. Databases live as pages too, and each row in a database can open as its own page with rich content. Because everything is a page, it is easy to move items around, nest content, and turn almost anything into a linkable building block.
In Coda, your workspace is a collection of docs, and each doc contains pages and sub pages. Tables tend to sit at the center of those pages, with views and controls built around them. Instead of every row being a full blown page by default, Coda leans more on table rows as rich records with controls, lookups, and references.
The result is that Notion feels more like a flexible notebook that happens to have powerful databases, while Coda feels like a set of custom tools organized inside documents. When you compare Notion and Coda side by side, that difference matters for how fast people understand where to put things.
Learning curve and first time setup
Most people can get started in Notion in a single afternoon. You create a page, hit the slash key, and start dropping in blocks for text, headings, checklists, or simple databases. Templates for meeting notes, wikis, personal tasks, and project hubs make it easy to get value quickly before you touch advanced features.
Coda also offers starter docs and an in product guide, but the learning curve is sharper once you go beyond basic notes. It takes time to understand how tables, formulas, and Packs work together, and many teams only see the benefits after a few rounds of experimentation. If your team is not used to tools with formulas and automations, Coda vs Notion can feel like learning a light database platform rather than a writing tool.
If you need something your entire team can understand and use within days, Notion usually has the edge. If you are comfortable investing more upfront time to design systems that behave like custom software, Coda will give you more power in the long run.
Notion vs Coda for writing, notes, and knowledge bases

Both tools started from the idea of making digital documents less painful, but they lean into writing in different ways.
Editor experience and note taking
Notion gives you a clean, block based editor that stays out of the way while you type. You can quickly format text, add callouts, create toggle lists, embed media, and turn any heading into a link in your outline. Backlinks and simple referencing make it easy to connect related notes into a light personal wiki.
Coda also lets you write in a focused editor, but its interface always reminds you that tables, controls, and views are nearby. That is powerful when you want to mix structured data with text, such as writing a spec with an embedded task table, but it can feel heavier if all you need is a fast notebook. For pure writing, many people find Notion more comfortable.
If your primary use case is meeting notes, briefs, documentation, and other text first workflows, Notion vs Coda differences show up quickly. Notion tends to require fewer clicks and fewer concepts to remember, which matters when you want everyone on the team to actually write things down.
Building a team wiki or knowledge hub
Turning Notion into a team wiki is straightforward. You create a top level home page, add pages for teams or topics, and link out to docs, SOPs, onboarding guides, and policies. Databases can back more structured hubs like people directories, asset libraries, or feature logs, but the core experience is still page driven.
Coda can absolutely handle knowledge bases, especially if you want to tie documentation directly to tables of projects or systems. However, because Coda docs are a bit more complex, you may find that casual contributors hesitate to edit or add pages. The structure is powerful but can feel less like a familiar wiki and more like a tool you have to learn.
If your goal is a living handbook where everyone feels comfortable editing, Notion usually wins that comparison.
Collaboration, comments, and search
On collaboration, both apps tick the main boxes: real time editing, comments in context, mentions, and notifications. In Notion, commenting on blocks inside a page or database entry feels natural, and mentions tie discussions back to people or pages. You can keep long running threads inside docs instead of in endless chat history.
Coda handles collaboration well too, especially when comments relate to table rows or controls that trigger actions. For teams that live in structured data, that is a nice touch, because conversations can happen next to the actual records you are updating.
Search is solid in both, though many users report that Notion's combination of quick search and sidebar navigation makes it slightly easier to jump between related docs. In practice, that can mean less time hunting through menus and more time actually using the workspace.
Coda vs Notion for databases, projects, and automation

When people ask whether they should choose Coda or Notion for serious work, they often care about databases, project tracking, and automation. This is where the two tools start to diverge more clearly.
Databases vs tables: relations, lookups, and rollups
Notion databases let you store structured data with properties for text, numbers, dates, relations, rollups, formulas, and more. You can create multiple views on the same database, such as table, board, calendar, list, or timeline, and filter or group data in each view. Relations and rollups connect databases together, so you can link tasks to projects, projects to goals, and so on.
In Coda, tables play a similar role but go further. Lookup columns let you reference data from other tables in a very flexible way, and the formula language is closer to spreadsheets, which makes complex calculations and dynamic filters easier for people who think in formulas. Tables can sync across docs, giving you more options for reuse and centralizing key data.
In daily use, the difference between Notion and Coda for linked data is about comfort and depth. Notion's relation and rollup system is easier to understand for non technical users, while Coda's table and formula system rewards teams that are willing to learn a more advanced model.
Project and task management setups
Both tools can power project and task management, from simple to fairly advanced setups. In Notion, you might have a database for tasks, another for projects, and views like kanban boards, calendars, and timelines. Linking tasks to projects and owners, then building dashboards per person or per team, is very doable without much configuration.
In Coda, project setups often start with a central table containing tasks or work items, then layer on views, filters, and formulas. Because buttons and controls can trigger changes or send notifications, you can build more interactive project hubs, where clicking a button updates status, logs timestamps, or alerts someone in Slack.
Compared to dedicated project management tools, neither Notion nor Coda has every specialized feature out of the box, but they both let you design something that matches your process. The main difference is that Notion makes it easier to design those systems visually, while Coda lets you push further into custom logic and automation.
Automation, buttons, and workflows
Notion has gradually added more automation capabilities, including database automations, reminders, and deeper integrations with tools like Zapier, Make, and native partners. For many teams, connecting Notion databases to other apps through these platforms is enough to keep information flowing.
Coda takes a more direct approach. Buttons in your docs can trigger actions like updating rows, sending emails, or posting messages. Rules can run automatically when conditions are met, and Packs bring in data from tools such as Slack, Jira, or Google Calendar while also being able to push changes back.
If your team runs on complex workflows that need many small automated steps inside the doc itself, Coda has the advantage. If you mostly need solid databases with integrations that connect to the rest of your stack, Notion will cover a lot of ground with less complexity.
Showdown of Notion AI and Coda AI
AI is now a core part of both tools, not just a side feature, so it deserves its own look.
Writing, summarizing, and knowledge Q&A
Notion AI is tightly integrated into the writing experience. You can ask it to brainstorm ideas, outline a page, rewrite a paragraph, or summarize a long document without leaving the editor. It also helps you ask questions about content stored in your workspace, turning your wiki into something closer to a conversational knowledge base.
Coda AI also supports writing, editing, and summarizing, but its sweet spot starts to emerge when you work with structured data. You can use AI to summarize rows, generate text based on table values, or help write content that lives alongside your tables and controls. For teams that already live in Coda tables, this can save a lot of time.
If your main use is writing, note taking, and turning scattered docs into clean summaries, Notion's AI experience feels a bit more direct and polished. Both are capable, but Notion's focus on writing shows.
AI for data, formulas, and workflow building
When it comes to data and formulas, Coda AI leans into its table centric nature. It can suggest formulas, help you build logic, and assist with transforming data between tables. That makes it easier for non experts to build more advanced setups than they might attempt on their own.
Notion AI can also help with formulas and database content, but the experience is still more text focused. You can generate property values, clean up entries, or create content inside a database view, yet it does not feel as formula heavy as Coda.
If you want AI to help you design complex internal tools based on tables and logic, Coda has an edge. If you want AI to help you write better and move faster in docs and wikis, Notion still feels like the more natural fit.
AI pricing, limits, and value for teams
Pricing models change over time, but there are some stable patterns worth understanding. Notion typically treats AI as an add on you enable per user, which keeps the core product affordable and lets teams decide who really needs AI assistance. That works well if only part of your team writes or edits heavy content.
Coda often bundles AI access into its plans with credit based limits tied to doc makers. This can be attractive for teams that are already paying for Coda as their main workspace, especially if they lean on AI for formulas and structured workflows.
For a team deciding between Notion or Coda as an AI first workspace, the question is less about raw price and more about where you expect AI to help the most. If your biggest pain is writing and understanding docs, Notion AI offers strong value. If your challenge is building and maintaining complex tables and workflows, Coda's AI may feel more impactful.
Integrations, ecosystem, and extensibility
Both tools live in a larger ecosystem of apps, automations, and template creators, which can influence your choice more than you expect.
Native integrations and APIs
Notion offers a growing list of native integrations along with a well documented public API. That API makes it straightforward to connect Notion to tools like Zapier, Make, and custom scripts so data can move in and out of your workspace. For most teams, this is enough to integrate Notion into the rest of their stack.
Coda's integrations are built around Packs. Each Pack connects to another tool or service, letting you pull data into tables or push actions back out. Combined with buttons and automations, Packs can turn Coda docs into control centers for things like calendars, CRM records, or issue trackers.
From an integration standpoint, Coda vs Notion is less about "which has more" and more about style. Notion feels like a flexible hub that works well with general purpose automation platforms, while Coda feels like a place where integrations are woven directly into your tables.
Templates, add ons, and community tools
Notion has a massive ecosystem of templates, both free and paid, covering everything from personal life planners to company wide operating systems. There are also many third party creators, agencies, and consultants who design Notion setups specifically for content teams, startups, and larger companies.
Coda has a smaller template gallery but still offers strong examples, especially for operations, sales, and engineering teams that want structured workflows. There are also Coda experts and agencies that specialize in building complex docs and internal tools.
If having a huge library of ready made templates and community resources matters to you, Notion compared to Coda clearly has the broader ecosystem. That can shorten onboarding time and give you proven patterns to start from instead of designing everything from scratch.
Publishing, sharing, and turning workspaces into websites
Both tools allow public sharing, but with different strengths. In Notion, turning a page or database into a public site is as simple as toggling a share setting and copying a link. Many teams use this for docs, handbooks, or lightweight landing pages.
Coda also lets you publish docs publicly and even create gallery style listings for public docs, which is useful when you want to share interactive tools or templates. However, Coda's publishing feels more like sharing an app or calculator than creating a traditional website.
If you want to go beyond basic publishing, Notion pairs very well with Super. You can turn Notion pages into fast, branded websites, blogs, or documentation hubs without rebuilding your content elsewhere. That combination makes Notion plus Super a compelling alternative to classic CMS tools for many use cases.
Pricing and value of Notion and Coda

Pricing is not just about the monthly number on the pricing page. It is about how that model scales with your team.
Pricing models at a glance
Notion pricing is straightforward: you pay per user, with a generous free plan for individuals and small teams. The free tier already includes plenty of pages and databases, so many people can run large parts of their workflow without paying until they truly need advanced features.
Coda uses a doc maker model for many of its plans, where you pay for the people who create and own docs, while contributors who only view or lightly edit can often join for free. There is also a free tier, but table and row limits show up sooner, which nudges serious teams toward paid plans.
For small groups who all need full access, the difference between Notion and Coda pricing is often minimal. For larger organizations where only a subset of people build systems and many mainly view them, Coda's model can become attractive.
Notion vs Coda for individuals and small teams
If you are a solo user, freelancer, or very small team, Notion is usually the simpler and cheaper starting point. The free plan is generous, the interface is approachable, and the community provides patterns you can copy. Upgrading to a paid plan is more about unlocking quality of life improvements than fixing hard limits.
Coda can work well for individuals too, especially if you love building structured systems and enjoy working with tables and formulas. However, many solo users find that they do not fully use the extra power and that the mental overhead is higher than they need.
In this sense, for individuals and small teams, Notion vs Coda differences tilt in favor of Notion unless you already know you want a very data heavy setup.
Coda or Notion for growing and enterprise teams
For growing teams and larger companies, the picture gets more nuanced. If your primary need is a shared wiki, project hub, and light database platform that everyone touches regularly, paying per user in Notion is easy to understand and budget for. It also aligns well with a culture where everyone contributes to the workspace.
If you have a structure where a smaller "systems" team builds tools for everyone else, Coda's doc maker model can be cost effective. A handful of makers can design powerful docs and internal tools, while many others use them without needing paid seats.
Total cost of ownership also includes the time needed to design, maintain, and teach your systems. Notion's simpler model can reduce that overhead, while Coda's flexibility can save time later if you lean into more automation and tooling.
Performance, reliability, and security basics

Choosing a workspace is not only about features. It is also about how fast, reliable, and safe it feels day to day.
Speed, stability, and offline behavior
Both apps are web first, so performance can vary depending on your browser, device, and network. In general, Notion feels snappy for most document and database work, though very large databases can slow down if they are not filtered or structured well.
Coda can feel a bit heavier when working with complex docs full of tables, formulas, and Packs. That is the tradeoff of having more logic running inside the doc itself. For some teams this is barely noticeable, while for others it becomes a factor in choosing where to build certain workflows.
Offline support is stronger in Notion thanks to its desktop and mobile apps, which cache content for use without a connection. Coda is more limited offline, so if your team regularly needs to work without stable internet, that might nudge you toward Notion.
Desktop, mobile, and cross device experience
Notion offers desktop apps for major platforms along with mobile apps that are mature enough for everyday use. You can capture notes on the go, review docs on your phone, and still enjoy a consistent experience when you get back to your laptop.
Coda also has mobile apps and works well in the browser, but many users find the mobile experience more constrained when working with complex tables and controls. That is understandable given how much is happening inside a Coda doc, but it is something to factor in if your team is often mobile.
If you expect people to live in the tool across devices, Notion's smoother mobile and desktop experience can make adoption easier.
Permissions, roles, and security overview
Both tools support granular permissions at the page or doc level, along with workspace level roles and sharing settings. You can invite collaborators, share content with guests, or publish content more broadly.
On the security side, both vendors invest in common standards such as encryption in transit and at rest, enterprise features on higher plans, and compliance certifications over time. The specifics change as each company updates its offerings, so it is always worth checking the latest security documentation.
For most small and mid sized teams, either platform will meet basic security needs. Enterprise buyers will want to compare details like SSO options, audit logs, and compliance reports more closely.
Real world workflows: Notion vs Coda for different teams
Feature lists are useful, but the choice often becomes clearer when you look at real workflows.
Solo creators and personal productivity
For individuals, Notion has become a popular "second brain" because it is so easy to bend into a personal system. You can build a life dashboard, personal CRM, content planner, and goals tracker using templates or your own designs. The wiki like structure makes it natural to link notes and ideas together.
Coda can be great for personal systems too, especially if you love spreadsheets and want your life to run on clever tables and automations. You can design intricate dashboards and trackers that feel almost like custom apps.
However, when you compare Notion and Coda purely for solo productivity, Notion usually feels more natural for most people. It asks you to think in pages and simple databases first rather than in tables and Packs.
Content, marketing, and documentation teams
Content and marketing teams spend their days juggling briefs, drafts, calendars, assets, and stakeholder feedback. Notion handles this very well: you can have an editorial calendar database, pages for briefs, linked views for each channel, and a wiki for guidelines and brand docs.
Coda can support similar setups using tables for content pieces, channels, and tasks, with automation layered on top for reminders and status changes. It can shine in more data heavy marketing operations, such as budget tracking and multi channel reporting.
If you mostly need a place where writers, designers, and stakeholders can easily collaborate on docs and see a clear content pipeline, Notion has the advantage. It feels closer to a shared writing room with structure, whereas Coda feels closer to a marketing operations lab.
Product, engineering, and operations teams
Product and engineering teams often care about specs, roadmaps, and issue tracking, along with integrations into tools like Jira or GitHub. Operations teams care about processes, checklists, and metrics dashboards.
Notion works well as a central place for specs, lightweight roadmaps, and process docs. You can integrate with other tools and keep the human readable side of your work in one place.
Coda really starts to shine when these teams want to build internal tools without writing code. You can create feature scoring tools, resourcing calculators, or complex operations dashboards that pull data from multiple systems and let people interact through buttons and controls.
In other words, for documentation and human friendly planning, Notion is often the better fit. For data heavy operations and bespoke internal tools, Coda has more headroom.
Which is the right workspace for your team?
There is no single winner in the Notion vs Coda debate, because they serve slightly different instincts. Notion wants to be the place where your team writes, thinks, and shares knowledge, with databases and automations supporting that foundation. Coda wants to be the place where your team builds custom tools, with documents acting as the skin around powerful tables and logic.
If your team values a clean wiki, easy onboarding, strong templates, and the option to turn pages into public sites, Notion is usually the safer bet. It simplifies collaboration and keeps your structure human friendly, even as your workspace grows. For many organizations, that balance of power and approachability is what matters most.
If your team is hungry to design intricate internal tools and is comfortable thinking in tables, formulas, and Packs, Coda may be the better long term playground. It can replace a surprising number of spreadsheets and light apps when used well. The most important thing is to pick the tool that your team will actually use consistently and then commit to building your systems there.
Why Notion with Super is a powerful long term setup

If you end up choosing Notion as your main workspace, adding Super on top gives you a simple way to turn that internal system into a fast, polished website without managing a separate CMS. You keep creating and updating everything in Notion, while Super handles performance, design, and the web layer for you.
- You keep all your content, docs, and databases in one familiar Notion workspace instead of maintaining a separate CMS.
- Super turns those Notion pages into fast, SEO friendly websites without extra plugins or complex hosting setups.
- Design controls in Super let you match your brand and create polished marketing sites, blogs, or documentation hubs from the same content your team already maintains.
- Changes in Notion sync to your Super site automatically, so your docs, help center, and landing pages stay up to date with minimal effort.
- You can combine Notion's flexible databases with Super's layouts to build directories, changelogs, resource libraries, and more without writing code.
- For many teams, Notion plus Super becomes a lightweight alternative to traditional website builders and knowledge base platforms.
If your team is already living in Notion, Super is the easiest way to share that work with the world. Connect your workspace, choose a design, and publish a site that stays in sync with your content.
Create your website with Super for FREE
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Notion and Coda?
The biggest difference between Notion and Coda is their focus. Notion is a wiki first workspace built around pages and simple databases, while Coda is more like a doc based app builder centered on powerful tables, formulas, and buttons. In short, Notion is better for knowledge and docs, and Coda is stronger for complex data and internal tools.
Is Notion or Coda easier to learn?
Notion is usually easier to pick up for most people. You think in pages, blocks, and simple databases, which feels familiar if you come from Google Docs or basic spreadsheets. Coda has more power but also more concepts to learn, especially around tables, formulas, and Packs.
Which tool is more flexible for personal use?
For personal use, Notion usually feels more natural. It is easy to turn into a second brain, life dashboard, or personal planner without a lot of setup. Coda can be amazing if you love designing systems around tables, but many solo users never need that extra complexity.
Does either app work well offline?
Notion works better offline thanks to its desktop and mobile apps, which cache content so you can read and make basic edits without a connection. Coda is more limited offline, especially for loading new data or running complex docs. If offline access matters a lot, that pushes the Notion vs Coda comparison toward Notion.
How does Super work with Notion compared to using Coda alone?
Super connects directly to Notion and turns your pages into a fast, branded website without needing a separate CMS. With Coda you can share public docs, but there is no equivalent layer that turns them into a full site with themes, navigation, and SEO controls. If publishing is important, Notion plus Super offers a cleaner path.
Which tool is better for non technical teammates?
Most non technical teammates usually feel more at home in Notion. The page and block model is easier to understand than Coda's focus on tables, formulas, and Packs. Coda can work if someone designs the system for them, but Notion makes it easier for everyone to create and edit their own pages.
Get Super’s bi-weekly Notion Newsletter
Create something Super
Get started for free